BW:
Did you have to leave out anything
from the book?
Gayathri: Sadly, the
parts about Rajini’s brother, Nageshwar
Rao, who died early. My editors felt it
was making the book too long. My heart
broke to leave that out because I researched
that extensively. I’m hoping it
will still get into the second edition!
BW:
What did the Superstar tell you about
the changes sweeping Tamil cinema –
all the innovation and offbeat themes?
Gayathri: He is full
of praise. Very open about praising young
actors. He was the first star to openly
recognize movies such as Paruthiveeran
and Kalloori as new achievements in cinema.
BW:
You spoke to the other stars. Did
anyone say anything provocative?
Gayathri: No, all of
them had only wonderful things to say
about him. Well…perhaps SriPriya
said something about how at one point
in their platonic relationship there had
been some tension, some disagreements.
But they sorted it out.
BW:
Every journalist must have wanted to write
Rajini’s biography. How did you
– an ophthalmologist by profession-
beat them all to it?
Gayathri: I was feeling
burnt out in my profession and wanted
a change. Writing has always been a passion,
so I knew I wanted to write a book but
I didn’t yet know what it would
be about. In March 2007 I was one of the
contestants in the hot seats on the KBC
show with Shahrukh Khan hosting. I didn’t
make it to the final but something about
writing a bio of SRK came up. That’s
when I thought: why not write a biography
of Kamal or Rajini? I was-am- a fan of
both.
BW:
Why Rajini and not Kamal?
Gayathri: To be honest,
my first idea was to write on Kamal. That
didn’t work out for various reasons.
That’s when I thought it would be
perhaps more interesting to write Rajini’s
life story.
BW:
And how did the project begin? How did
you get access to the Superstar, and what
did he have to say about you writing a
book on his life?
Gayathri: Once I returned
to Chennai from the KBC show I tried to
meet Rajinikanth right away. But he was
abroad shooting, and I met his wife instead.
When I told her about my project she was
happy that someone was writing her husband’s
story.
BW:
What did the Superstar finally say when
you met him?
Gayathri: He had no problems
about my writing his life but he made
it clear that he did not want to participate
in it because then it would become autobiography.
BW:
So this is an unauthorized biography?
Gayathri: In the sense
that Rajinikanth’s presence and
participation is zero in the making of
the book, yes.
BW:
So he doesn’t actually
talk in the book – that is, there
are no interviews with him?
Gayathri: No. He did
not want to talk. He did give me a few
letters of his that I could quote from.
BW:
But you met him quite a few times…what
did you’ll talk about?
Gayathri: We spoke always
off the record. So none of that went into
the book.
BW:
The book doesn’t tell his side
of the story in his words, then?
Gayathri: That was the
point of my book. This had to be not Rajini’s
point of view, nor mine but a third person’s
objective narration.
BW:
But don’t you find that the
biographer invariably shapes the material,
and so it does become your point of view?
Gayathri: That’s
the process, but I’ve used only
facts. There are no conjectures here.
BW:
So if the Superstar himself did not
tell you his story, how did you gather
all your information?