Non-glamorous
ladies through the years |
|
These
are days when the line between
a heroine and an item girl is
blurring to the point of insignificance.
Most heroines are also doing
quite a handy job of providing
all the glamour that an average
commercial potboiler might require.
Glamour is sometimes seen as
an indispensable part of a leading
heroine’s repertoire of
skills. Those who are not adept
at providing glamour or are
unwilling to do so are often
pushed to the second rung, the
so-called ‘homely’
heroine category. But, is glamour
really as important to a heroine
as it is made out to be, perhaps
not. The current trend might
suggest that glamour is definitely
a critical aspect for an actress,
but taking into account the
past few decades of Tamil cinema,
one might be persuaded to think
otherwise. We have had quite
a few successful, top of the
rung heroines who have never
been |
|
|
|
|
known to do glamorous roles. Even today,
there are a few who believe that glamour
is not everything. We can’t compare
eras. The concepts of ‘glamour’
and ‘homeliness’ have changed
over the decades. What is homely now would
have scandalous even in the 1980s. What
was glamorous in the 80s is perhaps subdue
these days. That is not to say that Silk
Smitha of the 80s could have been a ‘homely’
heroine in the 21st century, some things
don’t change with time. This is to
say that at least as far as glamour is concerned,
nothing is set in stone. So, comparing a
modern day heroine with a yesteryear heroine
on the glamour scale is not practical. This
article deals purely with the way the respective
heroines have been perceived during their
time and how they conformed to the accepted
norms of that era.
Let’s work our way backwards from
the present. As mentioned above, it is tough
to point out at present anyone who has not
at all had a brush with the glamour side
of things. There can be no absolutes in
the present when almost everyone has tried
glamour to some extent at some time or the
other, there can only be comparisons. On
comparison, perhaps Bhavana and Gopika come
to mind first. They seem to have been involved
in the least glamorous roles among their
contemporaries. Meera Jasmine could also
be a candidate if a couple of movies are
overlooked. Sneha is an enigma, oscillating
between the glamorous and the traditional
woman.
Towards the end of the 90s and during the
early part of the 21st century, Devayani
was perhaps the best example of the home
grown-no glamour heroine. She began her
career at a time when heroines were slowly
usurping the glamour arena completely from
the item girls. The influence can be seen
in a few movies, but still Devayani was
one who stood apart from the pack.
But, the best era was during the late 80s
and early 90s when we had perhaps the best
actresses in lead roles, all at the same
time. Glamour was not a factor at all for
them. They captivated us by their emoting
skills. How one wishes to have those times
back? Revathy and Suhasini are the names
that first come to mind. They did roles
that Tamil cinema will always be proud of,
they were assets to the industry (they still
are). National Award winner Archana is another
example. She might not have been prolific,
but she always ensured quality. An actress
who exuded dignity and charm was Sithara.
Pity, she was not seen in too many films.
Before this era, it is really difficult
to judge glamour quotients. Those were times
when lead ladies strictly kept away from
glamour, of course there were exceptions.
But, the majority was inclined towards the
homely and traditional. That was the era
of Saroja Devi, K.R. Vijaya and the likes.
There were times when Saroja Devi was said
to be glamorous for appearing in night gowns
that flowed way below the ankle. But, in
all fairness, that was the era when actress
only acted, never exposed.
|