|
|
In
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Albus
Dumbledore says at the end, ‘It takes great
courage to stand up to your enemies. But it takes
even greater courage to stand up to your friends’.
It is true. We are always very careful with our
friends and dear ones. We don’t want to
rub them the wrong way. Same is the case with
our superiors or peers. We don’t risk talking
straight and tough with them for the fear of touching
sensitive spots which might evoke quite violent
reactions. In short, we gulp down the truth, hide
the way we feel and sometimes fail to stand up
for what we believe in, because we are too concerned
about how our friend, peer or boss will feel.
It is also partially true that it is this kind
of tolerance (or diplomacy) that keeps the world
going. If everyone started talking their mind,
the Third World War would have been upon us a
long time back. But, this is not about diplomacy
and its necessity in a world full of contradictions.
This is about the courage it takes to stand up
and speak a truth that many others have been yearning
to. It is about taking on the mantle, about belling
the cat, about being yourself, about being original
(Asal).
|
|
Normally we are used to clapping and cheering to many
politically directed dialogues in Superstar movies,
like the ‘Naan CM illa, PM’ line in Sivaji.
But, what Ajith delivered that day, had even the Superstar
standing and applauding. The man who had given us a
thousand punch lines in his career was literally on
his feet after one from Ajith. Such was the impact of
what Ajith said during the function to felicitate the
CM that the entire media seemed to contract the whole
mega event into the few lines delivered by him. What
makes it even more special and gutsy is that it was
said in front of an audience that comprised of no one
less than the CM himself.
Now,
what did he say? Well, everyone would have heard or
read about it. But, let’s get a brief recap of
what was said. To put it in one line, Ajith said that
actors should be allowed to live their life the way
they want to. We have been witness to many events in
the recent past where the entire film fraternity has
been summoned for a common cause, mostly political.
Some of them have been to felicitate and praise (sometimes
even flatter to no end) the political powerhouses of
the state (whoever happens to be in power), and others
have been to express solidarity towards a burning social
issue.
While there is nothing wrong with such public exhibition
of appreciation or anger, the thing that irks and (what
irked Ajith) is the fact that actors are not allowed
to decide whether to be a part of such vents. There
have been many news stories over the past couple of
years where leading stars have been issued show cause
notices for not attending events of such a nature. It
is difficult to disagree with Ajith here. It should
be a person’s prerogative to decide whether or
not to attend a public event or be part of a protest.
Refusal or reluctance to participate should not be seen
as heresy or treason. It is the same for every individual
and holds good for actors too, no matter how big stars
they might be.
When
Ajith said that actors were being arm twisted to take
part in such events it must have struck a chord in many
people which was evident in the way Superstar stood
up to applaud. Rajini himself has been part of many
such events over the years and has been graceful and
appreciative throughout. But, this public display of
support to Ajith’s point of view makes us wonder
whether he has been a silent sufferer all these years.
One wonders whether everything that we have heard down
the years are statements made under duress.
Actors
aren’t politicians by profession. And so, they
do not know how to exactly place their words (unless
written by a script writer) without bruising a few feelings.
Almost every function where film personalities, especially
actors, have tried to make strong comments on sociopolitical
issues has left us with some kind of unsavory off the
cuff remark which snowballed into a huge issue. The
kick that Rajni intended to deliver to Karnataka for
the Hogenakkal issue is a classic example. A more recent
example is Jayaram’s (again off the cuff) remark
on Tamil women which landed him in deep trouble. The
reactions to this statement, again led by film personalities,
took on an even uglier proportion; that of violence.
Both Rajni and Jayaram were literally forced into apologizing
and eating their words and these are not the only cases.
The fact is that all actors are not qualified to make
comments on issues of genuine social relevance and they
are best left to mouthing dialogues already written
down. But, as Ajith said, they are at many times forced
into speaking (read: landing themselves into trouble).
A
final point. We have at many times complained about
the tendency of politics being seen as a natural follow
up to cinema, especially with the number of film personalities
walking into politics. But one cannot blame them. Think
of it this way. An actor is happy doing films, but he
is forced to be part of all kinds of functions with
political overtones. It is pretty natural that over
a period of time he/she starts feeling that politics
is an easy game, why not try my hand at it? What Ajith
has said makes us think about whether it is actors who
are forcing themselves on politics or is politics forcing
itself upon actors? Either case is not healthy for the
democracy. Two entities as different as politics and
cinema should function independently. Of course, there
are reasons and times when everyone must come together,
but let it be by choice, not force. Thanks to Ajith
for bringing this up. Someone really needed to talk
about this. Let’s hope that the cat has been belled.
(By
Sudhakar, with inputs from Arun.)
Respond
to
Behindwoods is not responsible for the views of columnists.
|