|
|
When
did you last see Vikram on the big screen? It
has to be at least more than a year back because
that’s about the time when Bheema released.
Knowing the film’s box office (non)performance,
it is easy to gauge that many did not watch Bheema
in theaters. So, memory must take you back to
the Deepavali of 2005 (more than 3 years back)
when Majaa was released. The movie was fun, no
doubt, but it was not much of a grosser. There
are various factors being attributed to it, including
the strong rains that lashed many parts of the
state. So we have to go back further to June 2005
when Anniyan made it to the big screen. Now we
know how big it was. Shankar’s larger than
life idea and picturization, Vikram’s stunning
performance in all three identities and some elements,
especially the fights that were never-before seen
in Tamil cinema – the movie was a blockbuster.
It busted the myth that mammoth budgets were not
viable in Tamil cinema. Looking back now, after
the colossal Sivaji and Dasavatharam, the Rs.
25-30 crore budget of Anniyan may look small.
But, the fact is that it set the precedent of
making a big budget viable with |
|
intelligent
and innovative film making and aggressive marketing
and release tactics. While the credit for showing the
courage to put the money behind this undertaking must
go to Aascar Ravichandran, Shankar’s vision and
Vikram’s dedication were vindicated Aascar’s
courage. You might be wondering about where this piece
is headed, tracing Vikram’s career graph back
to 2005 and his last real hit.
The point is: all actors have hits and flops, no one
is immune. An actor’s growth into a star is determined
by how well he manages either of them. Failures are
meant to be immediately brushed aside with sights on
the next project. More importantly, success has to be
milked. It is easy to take this statement in a negative
context. So, to put it in perspective let’s say
that one has to ‘make hay while the sun shines’.
Again, by using this piece of ancient wisdom, one is
not trying to say that all actors should hike their
salaries immediately after a hit. The idea is that,
in filmdom, a universal hit is not very easily achieved.
We have films for the classes and films for the masses.
What is liked by one section may not go down well with
the other, reactions might vary. But, when an actor
gets to be part of a film that is liked by almost all
sections, that is the right time to step on the gas
(once again: this does not point to anything monetary).
When an actor delivers a hit, his popularity graph amongst
audience will hit a crest and it is important to ride
that crest into the next release. To put it simply:
the actor’s next film should hit theaters when
the audiences’ memory is still fresh with respect
to his last release. The audience must enter theaters
expecting another hit from the actor, that’s where
the actor transforms into a star.
With the amount of films, good and bad, releasing these
days, it becomes imperative for an actor to have regular
releases to remain in the audiences’ frame of
thought on a consistent basis. Otherwise, in our times
of fast food and short attention spans, all memory of
an actor will be put on the back burner from where we
retrieve bits and pieces from time to time; the big
picture is lost.
From conversations that one has in everyday life, it
is easy to gauge an actor’s current popularity
index. It is difficult to recall the last time when
Vikram was the subject of discussion in any conversation
about movies. This is not any attempt to question Vikram’s
acting prowess (I remember that he is a national award
winner) or to compare him with any other star. But,
one cannot overlook the fact that other contemporary
stars like Vijay, Ajith and Suriya have been constantly
in the public view with regular releases. Their fate
at the box office is a different matter. Being a star
is not just about acting outstandingly well; it is also
about managing one’s career. This is not a criticism
of how Vikram has managed his career.
Let’s take a cricketing analogy here. Many of
you would have heard about the term ‘pacing an
innings’, it is a crucial factor, especially in
one day cricket where batsmen tend to get bogged down
in the middle overs. It is something similar that is
happening to Vikram at the moment. He is so intent on
quality that regular releases have been missing, analogous
to a batsmen being intent on preserving his wicket and
letting the run rate drop.
A good innings is one that mixes caution with aggression;
a good career has to have quality and quantity. We all
love Vikram for his unflinching commitment towards any
role that he takes up. It is this trait of his that
makes us want to see more of him on screen and ironically
it is this same trait that is spacing his releases too
far apart for our comfort. In his quest for perfection,
he chooses very carefully but unfortunately ends up
distancing himself from the regular moviegoer. Of course,
it would be injustice to Vikram if one was not to mention
that fortune has played spoilsport over the past couple
of years, with the filming of Bheema stretching out
over the period. Now, Kanthaswamy, the mega project
has taken well over a year in the making and Raavan
is not going to be a quickie either, especially after
Mani Rathnam’s hectic work schedules have unfortunately
taken a toll on his health. We do not doubt the quality
that will come with both these movies. But let’s
also hope that we get to see our most reliable actor
and star on screen with far more regularity. Let’s
hope for better fortunes and new beginnings.
(By
Sudhakar, with inputs from Arun Gopinath.)
Respond
to
Behindwoods is not responsible for the views of columnists.
|