required in any situation? Why write that into the script,
in the first place? The men in our movies- even heroes-
routinely slap women. Heroes slap heroines, fathers
slap daughters, brothers slap sisters, uncles slap nieces,
husbands slap wives. And if a female character slaps
a male character, she will be slapped back twice because
she dared.
Just once I'd like to see a movie where a woman slaps
a man and she is not slapped back. Oh wait, it actually
does happen quite often –when a mother slaps her
son. This age old mother-son sentiment alone is permitted.
But seriously, it would be so cool if even one of our
heroes insists that he does a scene where the heroine
slaps him and he doesn't slap back. What pleasure is
the audience supposed to derive from watching women
being slapped around? The more educated in the audience
might understand that it is just a movie, and that the
hero is playing a character, but the masses, especially
some men, might think it is the right way to treat women
because the hero does so.
It's a pity that our educated heroes also don't object
to this in the script. I'm all for item songs, and I
enjoy a song loaded with sexuality as much as the next
man. But we will earn the privilege of indulging in
them only if the rest of the film treats the heroine,
the item girl and the rest of the women characters with
sensitivity, fairness, un-condescension, respect and
love. The other day I was watching Vallavan again on
DVD and was pleasantly surprised to see Simbu apologize
to Reema Sen: "Whatever the provocation was, it
was wrong for me- a male- to slap you" he says.
This is at least a first step. And then, in an even
more surprising scene, he allows Reema to slap him back
twice. Earlier, he says that now famous dialogue about
not threatening girls into falling for you, but wooing
them through a deep friendship.
The undercurrent of violence towards women that runs
through many Tamil movies is disturbing. Women as villains,
women being shouted at, women being humiliated and teased
through insinuating dialogue, and women as sex toys.
The women in the audience patiently bear it, but I'm
not sure why the heroines stand for it. I guess if they
objected, they might not even get to be the heroine
after that. Apart from all the slapping around that
goes on, there are all those regressive patriarchal
values embedded in our stories. Many Tamil movies portray
brutal patriarchy masked as old fashioned values. Jyothsna
Bhavanishankar, a colleague, remarks, “As a woman,
it is very demeaning to watch another woman being slapped.
But I am also sure that women being women will carry
themselves with dignity in whatever they do.”
And why do we men need our heroes to be so macho all
the time? Most of us really don't, but that's how these
heroes have been conceived for the longest time, and
there's nothing we can do but stomach it. Every time
these heroes feel obliged to trash six guys with chains
and knives, we are all put in a position where we'll
have to do the same if we were ever to run into such
bad weather. Ideally, I'd like to negotiate with them,
and if that doesn't work… run – but since
our heroes make it seem like fun to trash them all….
A six pack is a good thing (at last our women have some
eye candy, too) but it doesn't- or shouldn't –signal
violence. It should suggest someone who is proud of
his body, who takes care of it, who likes to be fit,
and wants to look as good as he can. And while we are
talking of bodies, it would be nice if Tamil cinema
stops being coy about intimacy (it makes a family watching
a 'scene' at home on television squirm with embarrassment)
and becomes more honest about sex. Let's have less innuendo,
less sleaze, and more honest, hard-won emotion.
Tamil cinema is finally full of edge, freshness, surprise
and cinematic promise. There's just one thing that still
makes it backward: the presence –both subtle and
obvious –of the kind of extreme machismo I have
been describing. We can only hope that as Kollywood
cinema changes, it will also make deep changes in its
attitude to women, and leave behind its regressive,
conservative, obnoxious politics and become a cinema
that –not just us - but the world can admire
Respond to
Behindwoods is not responsible for the views of columnists.
|