|
|
‘Formulaic Realism’ – The New Tamil
cinema
|
|
|
|
Ask
any Tamil move fan this question – What
are the realistic Tamil movies that have come
out in recent years? You are likely to get identical
answers from almost everyone and it will unfailingly
consist of Raam, Paruthiveeran, Subramaniapuram,
Nadodigal, Mynaa while there will be other movies
that might alternate between the lists of different
people. According to popular perception these
days, the movies listed above are realistic (‘yathaartham’
in Tamil) and a good reflection of life in rural
Tamil Nadu. Now, analyze the storylines of all
the films listed above. Do they have anything
in common – plenty! First, they are all
away from the hustle and bustle of the city, they
choose to depict rural life and (now comes bad
part) they mostly have young men who aimlessly
fritter away their lives, they never shave, cut
their hair or do anything that will make them
look even remotely civilized and (the worst part)
all these films end on a tragic, morbid note with
someone dying, getting killed, paralyzed, mutilated,
jailed or any other sorry fate that one can think
of.
|
|
Most films listed above have another very important
thing in common – they are very well scripted,
shot, performed and are all commercial hits at the box
office. And, that is (or already has) giving rise to
a new dictum/dogma in Tamil cinema; ‘Realistic
cinema should not have a happy/positive ending, especially
if set in a village’. There seem to be a new breed
of film makers faithfully sticking to this unwritten
rule. Take for instance films like Goripaalayam or Renigunta
which more or less adhere to this rule. It is beyond
doubt that there has been a huge escalation in the number
of village based themes since 2007 and nowadays all
of them seem to carry an inevitably depressing finale
(of course, there is the rare exception).
We regularly cry out against formulaic commercial cinema
which usually follows the ‘one man saves them
all’ stereotype where the hero is the do-gooder
(nallavar-vallavar, in local slang). But, there seems
to be a parallel school of ‘formulaic realistic’
cinema that is developing which usually paints the protagonist(s)
as a good for nothing philanderer, puts him in the hands
of destiny, sends him into dangerous lanes and finally
finishes him off with the sickle. In fact, the so called
‘realistic cinema’ might be getting even
more formulaic than commercial cinema.
The most worrying part here is that none of the film
makers in question have made open claims of their films
being realistic. They just want to make good cinema
which will keep audiences glued to their seats in theaters
and they are doing a wonderful job of it. All the labeling
of realism usually comes from a section of the audience
who are the opinion makers and the media. But, a huge
portion of those who make such opinions and decisions
are from the city who know next to nothing about village
life.
One cannot be very sure about how a genuine village
dweller might feel about this stereotyped depiction
of their lifestyles; we can believe that they will not
at all be happy. But, they are neither opinion makers
nor have a voice in the media. Very recently when Easan
released, there were sections of the media which expressed
a bit of displeasure at the stereotypical depiction
of city-folk as people who cared very little about others.
Now, if one film which chooses to generalize a dark
element of a population can irk people into writing
pieces in newspapers, then think of the effect of numerous
such films on village folk. The same people who cried
“REALISM” from rooftops when Subramaniapuram
was released could not take Easan in the same sporting
spirit because it pointed at them. Suddenly “REALISM”
became “STEREOTYPING”. So much for consistency!
We have come to a point where a happy ending is branded
as ‘commercial’ while a morbid one automatically
gets the ‘realistic’ status. There must
be some kind of major negative mentality prevailing
in us for this to happen. For all one knows most people
still lead fairly happy and content lives. It has become
compulsory for a director to introduce death, separation
or punishment at the climax if he wants his film to
be considered realistic. Happy endings are for the weak
hearted; let’s get real, let’s get violent;
seems to be the attitude generally, if the movie is
set in a village.
Of course, as said earlier, there are some exceptions;
people who still believe that life can be good. There
was Kalavani which showed that village life need not
be all violent and bloody, though it did still have
the ‘aimlessly wandering youngster group’.
There is also Vennila Kabaddi Kuzhu which looked at
villages from a fresh perspective, Nandhalala which
steered away from a tragic end in spite of the script
offering such possibilities etc. But, generally speaking,
violence and wastefulness are norms of village based
cinema.
This is a time when students from rural areas constantly
upstage their city counterparts in board examinations;
when students from rehabilitation camps study their
way into medical colleges. Our villages have long risen
above senseless violence and wastefulness; our cinema
sometimes refuses to let go. One cannot say that cinema
which portrays the darker sides of village life should
not be made; but, at least we can make an effort to
not label them realistic, enjoy it just like any other
movie.
After watching Vaaranam Aayiram, many people said that
it was highly unrealistic that a man would fly all the
way to America just to find his love; agreed, it was
a bit far fetched. But, the same people found nothing
unrealistic when a guy stabbed his friend who had just
been released from jail – Subramaniapuram. Are
we confused?
Respond
to
Behindwoods is not responsible for the
views of columnists.
|
|
|
|